Human & Physical Resource Inventory

**I'm not sure how I managed to NOT post this with my initial Needs Assessment. I'm going to post it now, as my EDUC 5373 class is coming to a close. 

Technology Resource Inventory

As part of our Technology Needs Assessment, we also created a Resource Inventory. Again, I will focus on my campus for this initial information.

Human Resources

• On-campus Technology Specialist - responsible for device maintenance and repairs; may also assist with local connection issues
• Technology Integration Specialist - responsible for assisting teachers in small groups or one-on-one with selecting appropriate tools for instruction
• Digital Learning Project "Googler" - responsible for implementing Google's Digital Learning Project protocols to identify challenges, propose solutions, and implement strategies to close those gaps
• Librarian - responsible for cataloging technology devices and processing repair requests
• Teachers - responsible for designing curriculum and delivering instruction for their specific content areas
• Administrators - responsible for decisions about technology procurement
• Students - responsible for learning curriculum delivered by teachers and using technology to enhance and share that learning

Physical Resources

• Chromebooks - one per staff member and one per student
• Desktops - one per staff member and 4 computer labs (each with approximately 25 desktops)
• Document Cameras - one per teacher
• Interactive White Boards (IWB) - one per teacher
• Laptops - approximately 50
• iPads - approximately 50
• Calculators - approximately 350
• ProbeWare - 9 class sets

Technology Integration Plan - Moving Beyond the Vision

Last week, in my Innovative Leadership course, we were asked to compare and contrast Technology Integration Plans (TIP). We also started developing the Vision and Goals for our TIP. In week 4, we are asked to continue developing our plan.

What I have from last week:
Campus Technology Vision Statement
Campus educators will create a technologically rich learning environment to prepare students for a rapidly evolving global society through authentic learning experiences and seamlessly integrated technology in order to develop highly skilled digital learners.

Campus Technology Mission Statement
Campus administrators and educators will facilitate the seamless integration of technology into all areas of the campus, including student learning, the learning environment, operations, and interactions with the community.

Goals for Technology Integration Plan
Goal 1: Each student will show growth toward their individual goals.
Goal 2: Educators and administrators will ensure students and educators have equitable access to technology and the supports necessary for success.
Goal 3: Administrators will ensure appropriate technologies are utilized to support the efficient operations of the campus, especially concerning student data and communications.
Goal 4: Administrators and educators will encourage support and participation of community stakeholders as it relates to technology initiatives.

I'm working on my action plan now, and hope to start on the Professional Development Plan and Budget soon.

Guiding my work are several readings that were shared with us - cited below. The 10 Practices for High Achieving Schools and IDEALS discussed in Networking for Professional Learning Communities (O'Hair et al, 2005) overlap each other quite a bit. Three of the 10 Practices resonate with me immediately: #1 Shared Value System, #2 Authentic Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, and #5 Teacher Collaboration. These overlap with the Leadership (shared), Authenticity, and Discourse in IDEALS.

The 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update considers Learning, Teaching, Leadership, Assessment, and Infrastructure to be the areas of focus when integrating technology in education.

In chapter 10 of Renewed Accountability for Access and Excellence, (Shannon & Cate, 2015) discuss technology support for teachers being a sticking point as some teachers resent being pulled from class for technology PD while others don't want to show their skills for fear of their time being consumed by those wanting help. They also address how important it is to have support available on campus, as close to on-demand as possible.

There is SO MUCH to consider when implementing even a small change in technology. These resources certainly provide a good start!

Citations

Technology Integration Plan Options

In week 3 of my Innovative Leadership course, we are asked to compare and contrast Technology Integration Plans. We were provided 5 samples to examine:

• Oklahoma Educational Technology Trust/K20 Partnership - 2019 Grant Application Guidelines
• California K-12 Education - Technology Plan Template, Criteria, and Guiding Questions
• NYSED - 2018-21 Instructional Technology Plan Framework and Guidance
• Scientific Learning - District/School Technology Plan Template
• Hanover Research - The Digital Divide: Technology Integration in School Districts

The OETT/K20 Application, CK12 Template, and NYSED Framework are all comprehensive and very detailed. The OETT/K20 Application provides a list of guiding questions and lists requirements and the process for application submission. OETT/K12 also offers a scoring guide for the 11 criteria by which the application is evaluated. The NYSED Framework provides a step-by-step guide on completing their online application, including what the options will be for specific questions with drop-down menus or multiple-selection items. NYSED also provides additional guidance about where information might be found and what information appropriate responses might include. The CK12 Template provides gridded examples of adequate and inadequate details in a plan. CK12 goes into further detail by providing more specific questions and examples of what might be included in each response category.

The Scientific Learning Template provides a very basic fill-in form and checklist to self-evaluate the proposed plan. I feel like this form would be appropriate for a teacher to use to submit a proposal to their principal, or for a team to have individuals complete before comparing thoughts on a plan - overall a great starting point.

The Hanover Research Brief provides a succinct 5-step process and a diagnostic tool: 

1. Set Vision 
2. Develop a Technology Integration Plan
3. Provide Tailored Professional Development
4. Integration into Daily Instruction
5. Evaluate Technology Integration
   
   Diagnostic: 21st-Century Digital Learning Model Assessment

The infographics used by Hanover Research make their Brief easy to read and make it more friendly than the text-heavy guides developed by others. Hanover Research also provides exemplars and makes sure to include acronym explanations, that other developers assume readers already know. The 7-question diagnostic tool is also very user-friendly. This Brief would be a great way to engage stakeholders with the process.

When developing a Technology Integration Plan, we must involve a variety of stakeholders and maintain their engagement throughout the implementation of the Plan. Sheninger (2014) shares that 2-way communication is now the preferred method of communication and is elevated over paper mail, paper or digital newsletters, websites, and even email. He recommends using free social media applications to engage stakeholders and to direct them to resources that provide more details. Developing and sharing how-to documents and infographics for stakeholders to have guidance on the use of the social media tools of choice is also critical since not all of them already know how to create or use accounts for the wide variety of social media tools available. Interacting in this hyper-digital format requires leaders and organizations to have professional accounts with each provider. In addition to creating professional accounts, Sheninger (2014) also recommends holding workshops for stakeholders, sharing accomplishments of both students and teachers, curating resources for stakeholders, and dedicating a phone line for stakeholders with a service like GoogleVoice.

Gura (2018) provides there are ten roles of a Digital Change Agent: evangelist, advocate, great explainer, myth buster, coach, praise singer, vision quester, grand organizer, leader, and change agent. Being all of these sounds exhausting, but the TEACH method, shared by Julianne B. Ross-Kleinmann in (Gura, 2018), and the guiding question, "What technology can enhance this lesson?" (Gura, 2018, p.68) will be helpful to anyone filling any of the above roles. Add the idea that digital leadership "focuses on finding innovative solutions to deliver authentic learning experiences and support to continuously provide the best learning opportunities for students" (Sheninger, 2014, p.177), and I believe we have great tool-set to use when trying to initiate and implement digital changes.

Build Trust

Create Equity

Advocate on Their Behalf

Collaborate with Them

Be Humble and Infuse Humor

Citations